dcmf.co.uk

Pants On Fire!

by Franck Latrémolière

For a (usually) more positive and generous outlook on life, see Hector the Regulator.

14: Where are your Method M models?
Episode 14 of Pants On Fire (single page, PDF)
Want to fact-check this episode? Here are the links:
Box set: Draft review of DCP 206 decision
Draft review of DCP 206 decision (19 pages, 3.1M, PDF)
(incorporates episodes 1, 4, 6, 10 and 12)
13: Ofgem, meet Work. Work, this is… sorry they've run away!
Episode 13 of Pants On Fire (single page, PDF)
Want to fact-check this episode? Here are the documents:
12: More misrepresentation in Ofgem's DCP 206 decision
Episode 12 of Pants On Fire (single page, PDF)
Want to fact-check this episode? Here are the documents:
11: Renewable generators told to seek favours from Esso
Episode 11 of Pants On Fire (2 pages, PDF)
Want to fact-check this episode? Ask http://www.dcusa.co.uk/ for a website account and look for the minutes of DCUSA Panel meeting 100.
10: DCP 206 cost reflectivity part 2: more ostrich than pig
Episode 10 of Pants On Fire (3 pages, PDF)
Want to fact-check this episode? Here are the documents:
9: Meet the most powerful DCUSA party: Esso
Episode 9 of Pants On Fire (3 pages, PDF)
Want to fact-check this episode? Here are the documents:
(*) yes, this is sad but true: DCUSA has passed the 1,000-page mark.
8: Ofgem's test for evidence of cost is a variable beast
Episode 8 of Pants On Fire (single page, PDF)
Want to fact-check this episode? Here are the documents:
7: Regulatory capture and constitutional controls, DCP 214
Episode 7 of Pants On Fire — typo corrected (2 pages, PDF)
Want to fact-check this episode? Here are the documents:
6: Ofgem errors on cost reflectivity, DCP 206 (part 1)
Episode 6 of Pants On Fire, 20 June 2015 (2 pages, PDF)
Want to fact-check this episode? Here are the documents:
5: Ofgem accepts DCP 161 cost claim with no checking
Episode 5 of Pants On Fire, 20 June 2015 (4 pages, PDF)
Want to fact-check this episode? Here are the documents:
4: Ofgem misrepresents DCP 206 cost-reflectivity arguments
Episode 4 of Pants On Fire, 20 June 2015 (4 pages, PDF)
Want to fact-check this episode? Here are the documents:
3: Ofgem misrepresents DCP 161 case study and critique
Episode 3 of Pants On Fire, 19 June 2015 (3 pages, PDF)
Want to fact-check this episode? Here are the documents:
2: Ofgem relies on untested information, DCP 139
Episode 2 of Pants On Fire, 19 June 2015 (2 pages, PDF)
Want to fact-check this episode? Here are the documents:
1: Ofgem misrepresentations and men of straw, DCP 206
Episode 1 of Pants On Fire, 19 June 2015 (4 pages, PDF)
Want to fact-check this episode? Here are the documents: