February 2014 data on CDCM revenue matching

by Franck Latrémolière on 9 April 2014

MIG issue form and attachment:

• MIG issue CDCM rate of return – issue form (single page, Microsoft Word)
• MIG issue CDCM rate of return – attachment (Microsoft Excel)

Impact of reducing the CDCM rate of return to 4.3 per cent:

• Impact tariffs 4.3% rate of return (Microsoft Excel)
• Impact revenue 4.3% rate of return (Microsoft Excel)
• Impact tariffs 4.3% rate of return with DCP 123 (Microsoft Excel)
• Impact revenue 4.3% rate of return with DCP 123 (Microsoft Excel)
• Impact tariffs 4.3% rate of return with simple scaling (Microsoft Excel)
• Impact revenue 4.3% rate of return with simple scaling (Microsoft Excel)

Impact of DCP 123 hybrid revenue matching method compared to status quo:

• Impact tariffs dcp123hybrid (Microsoft Excel)
• Impact pence per unit dcp123hybrid (Microsoft Excel)
• Impact revenue dcp123hybrid (Microsoft Excel)

Impact of simple scaling method compared to status quo:

• Impact tariffs ss132 (Microsoft Excel)
• Impact pence per unit ss132 (Microsoft Excel)
• Impact revenue ss132 (Microsoft Excel)

Impact of current revenue matching method (compared to no revenue matching):

• Impact tariffs clean132 v nomatching (Microsoft Excel)
• Impact pence per unit clean132 v nomatching (Microsoft Excel)

Impact of DCP 123 revenue matching method (compared to no revenue matching):

• Impact tariffs dcp123hybrid v nomatching (Microsoft Excel)
• Impact pence per unit dcp123hybrid v nomatching (Microsoft Excel)

Impact of simple scaling method (compared to no revenue matching):

• Impact tariffs ss132 v nomatching (Microsoft Excel)
• Impact pence per unit ss132 v nomatching (Microsoft Excel)

Other background documents:

• My response to DCP 123 Consultation Two (Microsoft Word)
• Rate of return calculations (Microsoft Excel)